Replies to wa1800z
Notices
-
@wa1800z hmm... how about to building the site on PHP frameworks instead of perl ? it's way easier and faster. Bedides it's easier to expand any time such created site (I create my own in this method)
-
@wa1800z Me (and probably more members) start to miss CA (with is offline from longer time now)
-
@wa1800z no problems here - forecast is cloudy (computing) without rain ;-) So I guess you all decided for a clean sweep ? Funny how the old guard keeps re-appearing...
-
@wa1800z im here for good :) sure thing
-
@wa1800z i am indeed in the homeland...
-
@wa1800z: Maybe make registration purely OpenID only? Reckon that'd help stop the spammage?
-
@wa1800z: Been trying to keep on top of it, one or two more peeps would be helpful though!
-
@wa1800z: Hi, I've just stumbled across this site and haven't quite got the gist yet, but the company I work for has an open source Kademlia implementation in C++if it's any help? http://code.google.com/p/maidsafe-dht/
-
@wa1800z sounds like building a cathedral without a blueprint - might work with the right leadership - but without leadership - it will be more like a picaso - something interesting to look at.
-
@wa1800z Neither can I (until n2nv2 is complete, which will provide similar mechanisms). So, that leaves us with either erecting a base to build and improve upon - or looking at something completely different ;).
-
@wa1800z ... authentication to 'master' servers (XMPP, OpenID, whatever) which would release the key for the network.
-
@wa1800z Alternatively, n2n v2 *does* support real keys and key indexes - the keys could be generated and distributed through a keyserver as you mentioned (it would be easy to add support for some kind of...
-
@wa1800z Yeah. I was thinking some kind of PKI-based F-to-F system (assuming we're not to rely on central servers). There are a few filesharing apps which do this, not quite sure how to implement it with sth like n2n though. http://bit.ly/cHa0qW
-
@wa1800z "The supernode does not hold the community encryption key and so cannot snoop or inject packets into the community." - so it's just a blind stun-like router which passes IPs within the defined community
-
@wa1800z Ah, I hadn't looked at that until now... looks interesting but it's a shame there's no Win32/64 port at the moment... will keep it in mind though.
-
@wa1800z Ah! I didn't notice that, I'll have a look at that when I get out of bed :P. Yeah, definitely. I'm not saying we _should_ use n2n, but so far it's the most complete solution closest to what we want - tinc would be a bit arsey for normal users.
-
@wa1800z I'm sure that page was in Czech last night! Haven't had a look at it as I'd need to reboot the srv to use Win32... can browse the sores[sic] though. I'll setup a supernode on an internet facing box today if you fancy some real testing.
-
@wa1800z I tested both on the local network, desktop running supernode+2 nodes, netbook running another node. They both seem to work, though there are some odd warnings with v2 (probably something to do with unfinished crypto stuff).
-
@wa1800z Finally got wiki::openid sorted - http://cyberarmy.net/wiki/N2n
- Pagination